[Table of Contents] [Previous] [Next] [Footnotes] [References] [HMK Home] The Daco-Roman Legend

The comparison of construction dates of the Hungarian and Rumanian cultic places presents important evidence against the Theory of Continuity.

Let us review the construction dates of the cultic places (churches) in the Transylvanian cities:

(Rumanian place-names in brackets.)

Place:

Hungarian:

Rumanian:

Arad (Arad)

1139

1865

Beszterce (Bistri_a)

1288

19th century

Bethlen (Beclean)

15th century

19th century

Bonchida (Bon_ida)

13th century

18th century

Brassó (Bra_ov)*

1223

1495

Fogaras (F_g_ra_)

16th century

17th century

Fugyivásárhely (O_orheiu)

13th century

18th century

Gyulafehérvár (Alba-Iulia)

11th century

1600-1601

Kolozsvár (Cluj-Napoca)

12th century

1796-1797

Lugos (Lugoj)

15th century

1759

Marosvásárhely

14th century

1750

(Târgu-Mure_)



Nagyenyed (Aiud)

14th century

20th century

Nagyszeben (Sibiu)

14th century

17th century

Nagyvárad (Oradea)

1093

1784

Piskolt (Pi_colt)

14th century

1869

Temesvár (Timi_oara)

1323

1936

T_vis (Teiu_)

13th century

17th century

Vizakna (Ocna Sibiului)*

13th century

16th century

Note: the churchs marked with * were built by Moldavian or Wallachian voivods on their feudal lands in Transylvania.

Several Other Hungarian Church Constructions:

Place:

Built in:

Alvinc (Vin_u de Jos)

13th century

Aranyosgerend (Luncani)

1290

Árapatak (Araci)

14th century

Boroskrakkó (Cric_u)

13th century

Bögöz (Mugeni)

13th century

Csíkménaság (Arm__eni)

13th century

Érmihályfalva (Valea lui Mihai)

1284

Gelence (Ghelin_a)

1245

Gernyeszeg (Gorne_ti)

13th century

Kerc (Câr_a)

1202

Kisdisznód (Cisn_doara)

12th century

Kistorony (Turni_or)

13th century

Kolozsmonostor (M_n__tur)

1059-1063

Magyarvista (Vi_tea)

13th century

Marosnagylak (No_lac)

1298

Nagycs_r (_ura Mare)

13th century

Nagydisznód (Cisn_die)

13th century

Réty (Reci)

11th century

Székelyszáldobos (Dobo_eni)

13th century

Torda (Turda)

12th century

Vadász (Vân_tori)

13th century

Other Rumanian Church Constructions in Transylvania

Place Name

Built in:

Alsolugas (Luga_u de Jos)

18th century

Bánlaka (Banlaca)

1700

Demsus (Densu_)

13th century

Füzesmikola (Nicula)

1700

Kristyor (Cri_tior)

1404

Lesznek (Lesnic)

14th century

Lippa (Lipova)

14th century

Nagylupsa (Lup_a)

1421

Oravicabánya (Oravi_a)

1872

Pártos (Parto_)

14th century

Ribica (Ribi_a)

1417

Szelistye (S_li_te)

18th century

Sztrigyszentgy_rgy (Streisânghergiu)

1313

Zeykfalva (Streiu)

13th century

It cannot be uninteresting when the Rumanian churches of Wallachia and Moldavia were built.

WALLACHIA

Place Name

Cultic Place

Built in

Buz_u

episcopal church

1500

C_ciulata

Cozia-monastery

1388

Câmpulung Muscel Negru Voda

monastery

14th century

Curtea de Arge_

ruler's church

14th century

Horezu

Varatec monastery

17th century

Pite_ti

ruler's church

17th century

Râmnicul S_rat

monastery-church

1691

Snagov

Snagov monastery

14th century

Tismana

monastery

14th century

Târgovi_te

ruler's church

15th century

MOLDAVIA

Place Name

Cultic Place

Built in

Arbore

church

16th century

Bac_u

church

15th century

Cotnari

church (ruins)

15th century

Dolhe_tii Mari

church

1450

Gala_i

fortified church

15th century

Putna

monastery

1466-1470

R_d_u_i (Bukovina)

church

14th century

Siret

church

1384

Sucevi_a

church

1584

Vaslui

church

1490

Vân_tor Neam_

monastery

1375

Vorone_

monastery-church

1488

On the basis of these data, it can be concluded that the Hungarian Christian churches (monasteries, abbacies) appeared at the beginning of the 11th century in Transylvania. The first church of the Rumanian population - the one in Demsus - was built towards the end of the 13th century, almost three hundred years after the first Hungarian churches.

The oldest Wallachian and Moldavian Christian churches (monasteries) were built in the second half of the 14th century. Numerous structures, however, did not follow the first church buildings until the second half of the 15th, and later centuries. This leads to the conclusion that the Vlachs, infiltrating Transylvania at the end of the 12th century and at the beginning of the 13th century, lived under better, more advanced conditions than those of their brothers living on the northern shore of the Danube. This is also in accordance with the fact that the Vlachs founded their states several centuries later than the neighboring peoples.

* * *

Referring the history of the Transylvanian Christian cultic places, we have only pointed out the circumstances that are enough to prove the untenability of the Theory of Continuity. We do not desire to praise nor to disparage anyone or anything. We only want to state and prove that those, who consider Hungarians to be late new-comers, have proclaimed war upon the historical facts. Our work proves that the Hungarians made Transylvania theirs on their own. They fused the people they found there with themselves. We bear out that Saint Stephen was an outstanding ruler. According to the opinion of his times, as well as judged by present day standards, he was a European authority and an apostle of Christianity, which has been embodying progressive conceptions. He was the first European ruler canonized by the Roman-Catholic Church.

The Theory of Dacian-Roman Continuity is untenable and baseless, among other things, because it ignores the basic and decisive question of Christian cultic places in the 10th-12th centuries.

Using the construction dates of the Christian cultic places, the existence, or the lack of them, we wanted to prove the falsehood of such doctrines. These doctrines, born of political considerations, show a totally misconceived idea of the ethnic picture of the Carpathian Basin in the first half of the 10th century. "...they revise the Carpathian basin's political and ethnical relationships in the 10th century by false data and basic errors." The romantic legend of the Dacian-Roman-Rumanian Continuity serves only political purposes without any scientifically acceptable proof.

 


 [Table of Contents] [Previous] [Next] [Footnotes] [References] [HMK Home] The Daco-Roman Legend